Instead of carrying out another survey I chose to use social media to gather my feedback as this would offer me a more personal insight and provide a more informal platform.
On this we received some interesting feedback. The first comment reads that the transition of the shots had a good flow and that the viewer liked the way the video was cut to the rhythm of the music. This is was a massive aspect of our video and so this was a good thing to hear back. This viewer, unlike the previous one, felt that we had conveyed the story of lyrics just like i previously explained and this was also good to hear back as the narrative in the video linked directly to the narrative in the song.
This is important as Narrative was a hugely popular response in our survey and was found in a lot of the music videos I, and the other members of the group, analysed. However we did receive the criticism that our guitarists could have been more convincing, this I take as a fair comment as only one of our guitarists could actually play guitar, this gives us a space for improvement, as maybe if we ever re-shot or started a similar project in the future we could remember to use real musicians.
The next comments weren't quite as in depth the second comment reads 'Really like the video, accompanies the song really well and fits great' This is quite a bit more general than the previous comment but still, positive feedback meaning hat we have achieved the aim, again, of creating a recognisably indie video to go with the song.
The last comment reads that the video is 'really really good' and the viewer picks out the shots from the arcade in particular. The only negative aspect they pointed out was that if one of the guitarists was pretending to be a bassist not to play it with his thumb. However this was never even something that occurred to me during planning. We got three guitars but didn't think about anything else like bass, and the traditional format for a band is at least a bassist, guitarist and drummer. However we left out a drummer as, from what we learnt in our initial research, tdcc play multiple instruments each but never really include drums in their videos as its none of their main instruments. This again is linked with the fact that 2/3 of the actors can't actually play the instruments and is maybe something we should have researched or considered more, to improve.
The differences in the comments relate to Andrew Hart and his theories. Hart said “Texts need audiences in order to realise their full potential for meaning. So a text does not have a single meaning but rather a range of possibilities which are defined by both the text and by its audiences. The meaning is not in the text, but in its reading.” This shows us that our audience will pick out different things from the video, each individual will interpret it differently, picking out different aspects of the meanings we created depending on their personal experience. I have created a video containing a set of symbols and motifs based on the conventions of the indie genre and the narrative within the song, but it is up to the audience to interpret these, and as I said they will interpret them differently. For example, The youtube commenter did not pick up on the use of the weather as an ironic pathetic fallacy and this was down to his perosnal experience and the things he noticed when watching it. However another viewer might pick up on that.